|
Post leaf-fall bud assessments
Rebecca Bruce, DPI Tatura
Buds and flowers were assessed to determine whether post harvest deficit irrigation had any effect on the
following years’ fruit production. We investigated whether the irrigation treatments had an impact on flower and vegetative bud number, and if bud dry weight could be used as an indication of the trees capability to produce viable fruit. At harvest, bud number and dry weight will be compared to final yield to see whether these measurements could suggest yield potential.
Bud assessment and lateral count – T204 Peaches
Pruning samples were taken in late May to assess bud number and type. One lateral was removed from six positions on the two trellised trees per plot (Figure 1). |  | Figure 1: Position of lateral samples taken for bud assessments on T204 Peaches
|
The length and diameter of each lateral was measured. The number of vegetative and fruiting buds was counted (including the number of double and triple buds). Buds were removed from the wood and dried before being weighed.
The only statistically significant difference found between treatments was in the number of triple buds per lateral (Table 1). The number of triple buds was significantly greater for the two treatments receiving 160% and 200% of normal grower irrigation when compared to the treatment receiving the least amount of irrigation, which had the lowest number of triple buds. There was no significant difference in the dry weight of flower or vegetative buds.
Table 1: Flower and vegetative bud number and weight for T204 Peaches
A | Flower Bud | Vegetative Bud |
| Treatment | No. Doubles per Lateral | No. Triples per Lateral | Dry Weight/bud (g) | No. Per Lateral | Dry Weight/bud (g) |
| 50% | 11.6 | 1.0b | 0.0143 | 23.3 | 0.0051 |
| 75% | 10.7 | 3.2ab | 0.0141 | 19.9 | 0.0049 |
| 100% | 11.6 | 2.7ab | 0.0139 | 21.5 | 0.0050 |
| 160% | 10.7 | 5.0a | 0.0140 | 18.9 | 0.0050 |
| 200% | 9.8 | 4.6a | 0.0152 | 18.8 | 0.0049 |
| P* | 0.500 | 0.018 | 0.369 | 0.182 | 0.992 |
| l.s.d. (p=0.05)** | not
significant | 2.338 | not
significant | not significant | not significant |
| Bud assessments – WBC Pears |  | Table 2: Flower and vegetative bud number and weight for WBC Pears |
Similarly to the peach trial, pruning samples were taken in late June from the pear trial block. One lateral was removed from the middle third of each plot tree on both the northern and southern sides of the tree. The length and diameter of each lateral was measured. The number of vegetative and fruiting buds was counted. Buds were removed from the wood and dried before being weighed. After processing, it was concluded that there was no significant difference between treatments for flower or vegetative dry bud weight (Table 2).
* A ‘P’ value less than 0.05 indicates that significant differences exist between at least two of the treatments.
** l.s.d (least-significant difference) indicates which treatments are significantly different to one another. If the difference between the two treatments is greater than the l.s.d. value, they are significantly different from each other. |  |
Treatment | Flower Bud | Vegetative Bud |
| Dry Weight/bud (g) | Dry Weight/bud (g) |
0% | 0.0367 | 0.0027 |
50% | 0.0280 | 0.0026 |
100% | 0.0260 | 0.0029 |
160% | 0.0311 | 0.0031 |
200% | 0.2770 | 0.0023 |
P* | 0.797 | 0.396 |
l.s.d. (p=0.05)** | not significant | not significant |
|
|