• Share this page on Facebook
  • Print this page

Roadside Joint Key message to Local Government (MAV & DPI)

Since 2005 the Department of Primary   Industries (DPI), Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) and   the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) have been working through   the issues associated with responsibility for pest management on   roadsides.  The issue of managing invasive plants and animals on   roadsides is principally regulated by the Catchment and Land Protection   Act 1994. It is however, affected by other legislation including the   Road Management Act 2004 and the Local Government Act 1989.

As a way forward, The Minister for   Agriculture has decided to establish an independently chaired working   party comprising of officers from the MAV, Department of Primary   Industries and other key stakeholders to examine the fundamental   questions of what the objective of roadside weed and pest animal   management is, who is best placed to efficiently and effectively deliver   it and potential legislative options to provide best outcomes. A   starting point for this approach is recognition by all parties that it   is time to take a fresh look at the issue in the context of wider   biosecurity and land management policy developments. Relevant to this is   the biosecurity approach to pest management which seeks to protect   Victoria from invasive plants and animals by improving decision making   and investment for prevention and early intervention, eradication,   containment and asset-based protection (see Figure 1).

Progress to date has been slowed by the   complexity generated by 15 years of incremental statutory amendments   combined with a diversity of both road ownership and management along   with varying levels of information about thousands of kilometres of   roadsides some of which may have received scant government attention   over the last 100 years. The current situation is that the Victorian   Government, municipal council or the adjoining landowner may all be   responsible or not for managing declared weeds or pest animals depending   upon the categorisation of the pest and status of the road. Given that   the incremental creep of administrative complexity has been accompanied   by an increasing awareness of biosecurity risks and improved management   methods it is an opportune time to re-examine the current roadside pest   and weed regime with a view to improving its efficiency and   effectiveness.

In the interim, to enable pest management on   roadsides to take place in the most practical and effective way   possible, DPI will continue to work in partnership with MAV and   municipal councils by offering the Roadside Grants program over the next   year. This program will operate on a ‘without prejudice’ basis and   therefore ongoing responsibility will not be assumed to lie with   councils.

This program will run for the next year and   will comprise a number of calls for applications. Details will be   provided on www.dpi.vic.gov.au/lgpartnerships. The administrative   process that delivered the first two rounds of the roadside grants   program will be reviewed to increase efficiency and address the project   requirements of councils

                     
Generalised invasion Graph

Figure 1: Generalised invasion curve showing action appropriate at each stage.

Current responses to Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the ‘Building the Capacity of Local Government to Respond to Pests’ Project?

The project is part of the Victorian   Government’s $205 million four-year Future Farming Strategy announced in   April 2008. The project is aimed at building a partnership with   municipal councils to manage Regionally Prohibited weeds, Regionally   Controlled Weeds and Established Pest Animals on roadsides in Victoria.

2. Who is responsible for managing weeds and pest animals on roadsides?

  The complexity of the issue is now   understood to be greater than originally thought and there is ongoing   discussion of what the practical consequences of the current situation   are for different parties. The State Government has been working with   the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) to develop effective future   arrangements. While this is happening, a grants program will be made   available to municipal councils to manage pests on roadsides to meet   immediate needs.

3. What assistance will DPI be providing?

  •  
  • The Brumby Government’s $205 million   Future Farming Strategy included a significant allocation to fund a   range of activities in tackling weeds and pests. As part of this   strategy, we are committed to helping councils perform on-ground pest   management, strategic planning and capacity building activities in   regional and interface councils across Victoria.
  •  
  • The Future Farming Strategy project, ‘Building the Capacity of Local Government to Respond   to Pests’ (BCLG) will provide funding for local government without   prejudice, to work in partnership with State Government to manage   Regionally Prohibited weeds, Regionally Controlled Weeds and Established   Pest Animals on roadsides in Victoria.

4. What are the next steps?

  The Government will continue to work with   the MAV on the issue of roadside weeds and pests. Information about the   Interim Roadsides Grants program for 2010-11 will be communicated in the   near future.
 
As a way forward an independently chaired   working party comprising MAV, Department of Primary Industries and other   key stakeholders will examine the fundamental questions of what the   objective of roadside weed and pest animal management is, who is best   placed to deliver it and how legislation should be used to provide best   outcomes.

5. Is this a $20 million interim grants program?

  No. This is just one part of a much larger,   four-year $20 million funding allocation for a wide range of actions to   tackle weeds and pests. This interim funding program relates to just one   of those areas - supporting local government in the management of   roadside pests. The remainder of the $20 million will be committed to   other aspects, including:

  •  
  • developing incursion and treatment plans for regionally prohibited weeds;
  •  
  • improving early response capability for new and emerging pests in a changing climate;
  •  
  • increasing voluntary compliance for regionally controlled weeds;
  •  
  • more effectively controlling weeds and pests on public land by expanding the Government’s Good Neighbour Program;
  •  
  • improving the use of bio-controls for management of widespread weeds;
  •  
  • reviewing wild dog management options;
  •  
  • increasing community involvement in more targeted programs for integrated fox management.

Additional Question:

What is the objective of the grants program?

The grants program is designed to manage the   priority threats posed by Regionally Prohibited and Regionally   Controlled Weeds and established pest animals on roadsides while an   improved approach is developed.

6. How much funding is available for each council?

Costs will vary from council to council   according to the size of the current infestations on their roadsides and   the way they choose to deal with it. Funding will be allocated on an as   needs basis for councils to deal with weeds and pests in their   municipalities.

7. Will Councils be required to match funding?

  It will be up to councils whether they   contribute their own resources. Funding is not contingent on councils   contributing to the cost of projects.

8. How will the grants program be administered?

The Department of Primary Industries (DPI)   will work with the MAV to develop guidelines for possible future rounds   of the grants program to meet the immediate need of managing priority   pests on roadsides and support action being taken by the community.

9. What type of activities will be included in the interim grants program?

  •  
  • On-ground work such as spraying of weeds   on roadsides (or the most appropriate control method for particular   pest species based on best practice)
  •  
  • Removal of rabbit warrens
  •  
  • Mulching of woody weeds such as gorse
  •  
  • Follow-up works on previously treated infestations from Rounds 1, 2 & 3.

10. What other activities will be funded?

The Guidelines will provide information on   the types of capacity building activities that will be funded by future   rounds of the program. It includes activities that improve the knowledge   of weed infestation locations and extent, training and the development   of procedures that prevent the spread of invasive species.

11. What type of activities will not be included in the interim grants program?

  •  
  • Capital purchases of equipment such as spray equipment
  •  
  • Long distance travel (ie. interstate or overseas)

12. How do councils access funding to tackle roadside weeds?

DPI Pest Management staff are available to   support and provide advice to municipal councils to develop project   proposals. Details of future rounds will be provided in the near future.

13. What are the timeframes in terms of applying for funding?

  Guidelines and project proposal templates   will be provided on the web www.dpi.vic.gov.au/lgpartnerships and will   advise of the timeframes for projects and closing dates for   applications.

14. How long will the program run?

Programs funded as part of the four-year   Future Farming Strategy will run until June 2011. Information on future   rounds of the interim roadsides grants program will be provided in the   near future.

15. What happens when the program finishes?

  The Government and the MAV will continue to work through the issues and provide an agreed
  solution.

16. Which roads are we talking about?

  All municipal roads as defined by the Road Management Act 2004. Some exceptions are
  freeways, arterial roads and other roads managed by VicRoads.

17. Which categories of weeds and pests will be funded?

  •  
  • Weeds that are declared in the   categories Regionally Prohibited or Regionally Controlled in the region   and also established pest animals, especially rabbits. A species list of   these categories of pests is attached.
  •  
  • Regionally Prohibited weeds are   weeds that aren’t yet widely distributed in a particular region of   Victoria, but have the potential to spread further. Landholders must   eradicate or control them on their land. Serrated tussock, for example,   is regionally prohibited in most regions of Victoria, except where it is   a regionally controlled weed.
  •  
  • Regionally Controlled weeds are   weeds like blackberry or gorse that are widespread and established in a   region. Landholders must take all reasonable steps to control and   prevent the spread of these weeds.

18. What about State Prohibited weeds?

This category of weeds is not affected and they remain the responsibility of State Government.

19. Will councils be prosecuted if they don’t control weeds properly?

  Whilst the issue of responsibility for the   management of weeds and pests on roadsides is being resolved compliance   activities will not be undertaken with respect to weeds or pest animals   on municipal roads.